跨越性批判
- 书名:跨越性批判
- 作者: 柄谷行人
- 格式:EPUB,MOBI,AZW3
- 时间:2024-06-16
- 评分:9.6
- ISBN:9787511733191
内容简介:
《跨越性批判》是日本左翼批判理论的代表柄谷行人迄今为止重要的理论著作。作者参照康德的“整合性理念”试图重建“共产主义道德形而上学”。同时, 依据“交换形态”论提出独创的资本-民族-国家三位一体说。
作者简介:
下载地址:
标签:
文章链接:https://www.dushupai.com/book-content-15872.html(转载时请注明本文出处及文章链接)
最新评论:
更多
-
南渡06-074.8 康德与马克思,此书中有一种形而上学的流溢,能启发心智,清新脱俗之感,日本的学术研究一流
-
zhurz01-25行文很跳脱,我没太看明白康德和马克思的联系在那里。首先跳过黑格尔把这两个时代的人帮在一起,就是很缺乏品味的事情:黑格尔、马克思都是无法超越的里程碑;即便黑格尔给马克思批判的七零八落,但马克思依然愿意尊称黑格尔为自己的导师——这就是导师的人格魅力。哲学的趣味并不在于是谁赢了谁或者谁谁和谁谁什么什么地方相似,讨论对和错本身就是很狭隘的事情;后一代人超越了前一代人,站在更高处俯瞰当年被前人奉为圭臬的信条如今变成今人的垫脚石。第一次读到黑格尔“马背上的世界精神”的震撼,是这辈子都无法忘记的宝贵体验;登山远望的胸怀和视野,才是这些哲学家们伟大的原因。另外带有种族偏见的话,日本人的学问水平是不差的,很细密很扎实;但遇到这种大问题,读起来老是给人有在钻牛角尖的感觉;过分沉溺细节,做出来的东西格局不高。
-
无虞08-28对康德的解读超凡脱俗,并创造性地以康解马,融精神分析与解构主义一体。跨越性批判是一种保持“视差”的视角,即不能仅仅停留在自己的视角或他人的视角,而是时而从自己的视角看看,时而从他人的视角看看,才不会落入骗局。这种视角似乎是一种强烈的二元论,但作者恰恰是要用这种方法去破二元论。可以这样理解:任何固定的静止的视角要么最终走向虚伪的同一性哲学,要么走向二元论——这都是欺骗。要保持不被欺骗,就要坚持一种“视差”,坚持一种动态和跳跃的批判性视角。柄谷行人的入坑书。
最新书摘:
更多
-
[已注销]2019-06-10Kantian philosophy is called transcendental, as distinct from transcendent. Simply stated, the transcendental approach seeks to cast light on the unconscious structure that precedes and shapes experience. And yet, can’t it be said that from its very inception, philosophy itself has always taken just such an introspective approach? If that is the case, then what distinguishes Kantian reflection? Kant’s unique way of reflection appeared in his early work, Dreams of a Visionary. Kant wrote, “Formerly, I viewed human common sense only from the standpoint of my own; now I put myself into the position of another’s reason outside of myself, and observe my judgments, together with their most secret causes, from the point of view of others. It is true that the comparison of both observations result...
-
Walt2016-06-10Kant is generally understood to have executed the transcendental critique from a place that lies between rationalism and empiricism. However, upon reading his strangely self-deprecating <Dreams of a Visionary Explained by Dreams of Metaphysics>, one finds it impossible to say that he was simply thinking from a place between these two poles. Instead, it is the “parallax” between positions that acts. Kant, too, performed a critical oscillation: He continuously confronted the dominant rationalism with empiricism, and the dominant empiricism with rationalism. The Kantian critique exists within this movement itself. The transcendental critique is not some kind of stable third position. It cannot exist without a transversal and transpositional movement. It is for this reason that I have chosen...
-
玄都观桂花糕2017-12-26非常精妙的推理,对我们来说,几乎或者不如说根本就没有什么影响。
猜你喜欢:
-
2024-06-232
-
2024-06-231
-
2024-06-233
-
2024-06-231
-
2024-06-236
-
2024-06-235
-
2024-06-232
-
2024-06-235