Social Mindscapes

Social Mindscapes
内容简介:

Why do we eat sardines, but never goldfish; ducks, but never parrots? Why does adding cheese make a hamburger a cheeseburger whereas adding ketchup does not make it a ketchupburger? By the same token, how do we determine which things said at a meeting should be included in the minutes and which ought to be considered off the record and officially disregarded? In this wide-ranging book, Eviatar Zerubavel argues that cognitive science cannot answer these questions, since it addresses cognition on only two levels: the individual and the universal. To fill the gap between the romantic vision of the solitary thinker whose thoughts are the product of unique experience, and the cognitive-psychological view, which revolves around the search for the universal foundations of human cognition, Zerubavel charts an expansive social realm of mind, a domain that focuses on the conventional, normative aspects of the way we think. With anecdotes and revealing analogy, Zerubavel illuminates the social foundation of mental actions such as perceiving, attending, classifying, remembering, assigning meaning, and reckoning the time. What takes place inside our heads, he reminds us, is deeply affected by our social environments, which are typically groups that are larger than the individual yet considerably smaller than the human race. Thus, we develop a nonuniversal software for thinking as Americans or Chinese, lawyers or teachers, Catholics or Jews, Baby Boomers or Gen-Xers. Zerubavel explores the ways in which thought communities carve up and classify reality, assign meanings, and perceive things, defamiliarizing in the process many taken-for-granted assumptions.

作者简介:
下载地址:
下载Social Mindscapes
标签:
文章链接:https://www.dushupai.com/book-content-46600.html(转载时请注明本文出处及文章链接)
读书评论: 更多
  • Deadwind
    01-06
    基本上也可以作为GRE写作素材了
  • Versöhnung
    07-13
    感觉一个新领域的sociology of xx都是这个套路,先拒绝个体主义,再拒绝普世主义,再用特定历史时期特定社会来contextualize,强调所有都是socially and historically constructed,三板斧咔咔下去,就“注册了新的研究领域”,本书体现得尤为典型。而这种新的名目是否值得一看,能否引发后续研究,就完全取决于研究者的功底了......
猜你喜欢: